(Here is the list of all web pages from this
server, arranged by language (in 8 languages).
Choose the page that interests you by
dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:)
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking over there on
"Menu 2".)
Here is the list of all my web pages from all servers.
These are arranged primarily by language
(i.e. as web pages in Polish,
English, German,
French, Spanish,
Italian, Greek, and
Russian.) For each language web pages are
arranged by their subjects.
Choose the page that interests you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking over there on
"Menu 4".)
All of us probably noticed the increasingly
intense exchange of arguments between
disciples of two basic views about the origin
of man. One of these views is based on the
Bible
and states that the man was created by
God. Another view is based on the modern
science and states that the man is a product
of evolution. The disciples of each one out
of these two basic views present their arguments
in a manner, as if only one of them is correct,
while the other one is false. But perhaps
such stands are just a stubborn insisting of
both camps on small details, while simultaneously
overlooking the entire situation which reveals,
that these details are just a fragment of a much
bigger picture of the origin and history of the mankind.
This web page reveals findings of a relatively
new scientific theory named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
or more precisely this section of it, which has
formally proven the existence of
God,
and which explained how this superior intelligent
being of the universe acts and what goals He pursues.
Analyses carried out within this theory indicate
that in fact both camps
which unnecessary argue with each other are
absolutely correct. After all, there are various
premises and evidence which suggest that the
man is really a product of evolution - as this is
correctly discovered and researched by Charles
Darwin. But simultaneously the course and goals
of this evolution is continually controlled by
God.
In fact God did NOT create everything in a single
go, and everything in already a final version of it.
He utilises the gradual evolution, means God
improves the Universe slowly although continually -
similarly as people do this with their long-term
developments and products. Therefore,
in reality the followers of both mutually arguing
views are right. So instead of wasting energy
and resources for this academic arguing, the
disciples of both views should rather join their
forces in order to determine how exactly God
controlled the evolution to create the man, and
in which way in his infinitive process of creation
He used, and still uses, the process of intelligently
controlled evolution as his basic tool.
This web page additionally tries to explain
also some puzzles connected with the
origin of the man. For example, it reveals
that the "missing link" from the past of human
family in fact can be the creature well know to
all of us and usually named the "siren" (e.g.
a creature similar to the "Little Mermaid" - the
well-known statue of which adorns the harbour
in Copenhagen, Denmark, while a relative of
her adorns the city of Warszawa in Poland),
and also that remains of these our ancestors
in fact can be hidden on bottoms of seas and oceans,
not on lands - where they are unsuccessfully
searched by present scientists. This web page
in item #C2 documents also the extensive body
of evidence that the closest still alive relatives
of humans are not monkeys, but whales and
dolphins. Everything that this web page states,
is based on the findings of a relatively new
scientific theory called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
Part A:
Introductory information about this web page:
#A1.
What is this
evolution,
and how present disciples of evolution explain the origin of humans:
The name "evolution" most frequently is
assigned to a scientific theory developed
by Charles Darwin, which (the theory) in 1859
was published for the first time in relationship
to the animal and plant kingdom in the book
by Darwin entitled "On the Origin of Species
by Means of Natural Selection", while in 1871
was extended also on the origin of humans
in another book by Darwin entitled "The
Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation
to Sex". (Darwin lived from 12 February 1809
to 19 April 1882.) There are numerous definitions
of this sensitive word "evolution". After all, this
word can be defined from many different points
of view. Probably the most popular definition of
it is provided in the encyclopaedia - I quote
it here after "The New Encyclopaedia Britannica",
15th edition, 1996, ISBN 0-85229-605-3, Volume
4, page 623: "Evolution: theory in biology that
postulates that the various types of animals and
plants have their origin in other preexisting types
and that the distinguishable differences are
due to modifications in successive generations."
According to disciples of the theory of evolution,
the mechanism which propels it is the process
of natural selection (the survival of fittest). According
to them, it is this mechanism that caused that
with the elapse of time the man evolved on Earth.
But before the man appeared, on Earth supposed
to live a still unknown ancestor of the man, to
which usually scientists refer as to a "missing link".
This ancestor supposed to be common to both,
people and monkeys. Therefore the disciples of
evolution claim that the closest relative of the man
in the animal kingdom are monkeys. (Usually they
indicate chimpanzees.)
Unfortunately, the blind insisting of the followers
of the theory of evolution, that only laws and forces
of nature provide the direction and the propelling
force for evolution, is NOT able to explain a whole
array of paradoxes and puzzles from the universe
which surrounds us. An example of one of such a
paradox is that independently from conditions in
which the evolution takes place, the final product
of it can be the same. Thus, for example bacteria
the evolution of which took place in Mars, and
which have fallen to Earth in Antarctic, have the design
and characteristics almost identical to bacteria from
Earth. But on Mars the prevailing conditions are
drastically different than these on Earth. Thus they
should lead to the evolution of creatures which are
different from these on the Earth. Another example
of such paradoxes is that the evolution does NOT
explain why intelligence is displayed not only by
the behaviour of people, but also e.g. by the
behaviour of elementary particles (i.e. components
of atoms). So is it possible that these particles also
are subjected to a natural selection which forced them
to evolve intelligence? In addition to these paradoxes,
as so far, in spite of intense searches, the present
science is unable to find even a slightest sign of
this "missing link" - this in turn seems to suggest
that such a link either does NOT exist on Earth,
or the disciples of the evolution seek it in completely
wrong places. Therefore it is necessary to search
for different mechanisms and different propelling
forces for the development of the universe, than just
such a blind evolution. So far, the most significant
out of these different mechanisms is indicated by
the disciples of the creation, who unnecessary
consider themselves to be a competition to evolution.
Also an increasingly larger number of people is
attracted to the theory of an "Intelligent Design".
The disciples of this theory believe, expressing
this with a large simplification, that the man from
Earth was designed and farmed by intelligent
aliens through the use of genetic engineering.
(Note that this just shifts the problem onto distant
stars, because it still does NOT explain who
designed and farmed these intelligent aliens.)
This web page adds still another view to the
discussion about the origin of the man. The
view presented on this web page originates
from findings of a scientific theory called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
It links together claims of both, the evolutionists
and disciples of the creation. This is because it
states that God utilises the process of evolution
in the gradual improvement of the universe,
and that the present form of people is just one
amongst numerous stages in this infinitive evolution.
It also indicates where most probably hide remains
of this "missing link" from the human evolution.
#A2.
Do really the followers of evolution contradict the disciples of the creation of the man by
God:
The disciples of the evolution behave in their
arguments as if they were sworn enemies of
the disciples of the creation, and vice versa.
However, if one analyses thoroughly arguments
of both sides, then it turns out that there is more
stubbornness and intentional building of walls
around own views, than the actual logic and
accord with empirical data on the world around
us. For example, the disciples of the natural
evolution (E) on purpose do not want to take
notice of the following facts:
(E1)
The process of gradual improvement of objects already
existing, which is described by the word "evolution", in
fact is the only manner in which intelligent beings are
able to improve the level of perfection in their products.
Putting this in other words, if a superior being called
God wishes to improve the level of perfection of whatever
He created, then in fact He must utilize the process of
introducing gradual improvements, which our science calls
the "evolution". Evolution is also used by people in their
continuous effort of constructing the increasingly more
perfect technical devices, intellectual products, descriptions,
accomplishments, etc. For example, if people were
invisible like God, but some scientists who arrived to
Earth from the space could watch e.g. our cars or
computers (without seeing people), then he also would
formulate the theory of evolution for them, claiming that
cars and computers on Earth are developing on
principles of gradual evolution.
(E2)
Principles of logic and methods of action remain exactly
the same, no matter who uses them.
Expressing this in other words, if the only method of
action which allows to accomplish increasingly more
perfect products, depends on gradual improving them
step-by-step - as this is done by people in subsequent
generations of their houses, cars, or computers, then
this method must be used by every kind of intelligent
beings, including God.
* * *
In turn disciples of the creation (C) of man,
not only that overlook the above facts, but in
addition do not take under account that:
(C1)
Many expressions and descriptions in the Bible have
purely allegorical meaning. In fact the Bible is
full of descriptions which should be taken allegorically,
not literally. For example see the "Revelation" 19:15,
which describes the arrival of Second Jesus to Earth,
quote "Out of his mouth come a sharp sword, ...".
(How one can take literally the description that
someone would hold a sword in his mouth. So this
description must be interpreted allegorically as a
statement, that words and ideas disseminated by
Second Jesus will cut enemies similarly as this is
done by a sword.) So it is just a blind stubbornness
to claim that the biblical description of the creation
of world and man must be taken literally.
(C2)
These who wrote the Bible used an archaic language,
which still lacked many ideas and terms present in
today languages. So how, for example, in times
of writing the Bible could be explained, that there
were seven evolutionary periods in the process
of creation of the world and man - if these who
wrote the Bible did NOT know yet the terminology
"evolutionary period" or "era". Of course, in such
case they used the word "day", which (the word)
in meaning lied the closest to these two terms that
they did not know. So it would be an absurd to insist
now on the literal taking the description that God
created the world and the man during 6 days (while
on 7th day He rested). Especially that somewhere
in the Bible itself is written, that in each place
where in the Bible the word "day" is used, one should
understand it as 1000 years. (I encountered this
statement in Bible sometimes ago, but presently
when I tried to find it again and refer it here,
I was unable to find it fast. But indirectly the
same is expressed by following words from "2 Peter 3:8" -
quote "But do not ignore this one fact, beloved,
that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years,
and a thousand years as one day." Exactly the
same is expressed in psalm 90 "A Prayer of Moses,
the man of God" - quote from verse 4 "For a
thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday
when it is past, or as a watch in the night.")
In order to be even more interesting, in Biblical
times the number 1000 was not meaning the same
as today number 1000. This is because then it
was the largest number that existed in the
Roman numbering system. (Romans marked it
with the letter "M", and they did not know any
larger number.) Thus the biblical expression
"thousand years" in fact can mean the same as
"so many years as it only is possible to express
with the largest number that we know". After all
present people also say "millions" while they think
"as many as only our numbers are able to express it".
One needs to remember as well, that for God -
who exists for ethernithy, the elapse of time
has a completely different meaning as for
people. More comprehensively this is explained
on separate web pages about
God
and about
time vehicles.
Thus, in the God's system of the elapse of time,
whatever for human historians will represent an
entire era, for God can be an equivalent of a
single day.
For more data about the creation of the physical
world by God see "part I" from the web page about
the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
or see subsection P6.1 from volume 13 of monograph
[1/4].
* * *
If one considers the above facts in his deductions,
then rapidly it turns out that both, the followers
of the evolution, and disciples of the creation, in
fact describe the same general mechanism of
the origin of man, only that they pay a whole
attention to just a single small detail from a whole
range of details and aspects of this mechanism.
So in fact there is no difference in claims and views
of either of these groups, but only there is a human
stubbornness and the someone's evil attempt to "divide
and rule" amongst others through the use of such
different views on the origin of mankind. Furthermore,
everything seems to indicate that the true message
which the disciples of the evolution are trying to secretly
disseminate via their views, is the message that "God
does NOT exist". In turn the only message which
the disciples of the creation of the man try to disseminate
with their arguments, is the claim that descriptions from
the Bible are NOT allowed to be treated allegorically
nor interpreted from the point of view of the advancement
of knowledge and the making of human language increasingly
precise, but should be taken literally up to every single
letter. However, it is worth to notice, that the philosophy
of
totalizm
in fact abolishes the validity of both these claims.
(I.e. it formally proves the existence of God, and
also it redefines more precisely with modern strict
language many ideas which in the Bible are
presented loosely with an ancient language.)
#A3.
How the scientific theory named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
adds its own findings about the
fact of the creation of man by
God:
Previously the fact of the creation
of man by God was postulated only by
religions. All what science would do,
is to contradict it. Science was unable
to find and to indicate evidence in
support of the process of creation.
In turn without knowing such evidence,
scientists believed that they have
a duty to stand "against" the creation
of man. (In spite that they also
had no clear evidence on the
impossibility of the creation of man.)
Initially against the claims of
religions about the creation of man
stand up only the Darwin's Theory
of Natural Evolution. Sarcastically
it was a "theory" only from a name.
After all, the data on which it was
based were collected in a single
small area. So the "evidence" that
it used was taken out of the context.
For a significant period of time
this "pseudo-theory" was all that
the official human science
managed
to sweat out about the origins
of man. So it generated a lot of
bad air. After all, it practically
instigated the entire human science
and almost all human scientists
to stand "contra" towards statements
of religions. But starting from
1985 a different scientific theory
named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
started to be disseminated. This different
theory also have its own findings
regarding the origins of the physical
world and origins of man. This time the
the findings of this other theory are
"pro" - means they reveal that man
was really created by God. So there
is a chance, that this theory of
dipolar gravity manages to repair at
least a part of the ocean of evil
that the Darwin theory generated.
So the situation on the present
moment is such, that already two
scientific theories do exist. Each
one of them states something exactly
opposite. Thus the matter of the
creation of man by God ceases to
be just a matter of a "roller of
science bulldogging through statements
of religions", and becomes a matter
of two opposite scientific theories
which coldly analyze arguments and
evidence available. Of course, for
various reasons, for example because
of the so-called scientific inertia,
or because of reasons discussed on
a separate web page about
carriers of evil,
the official Earth's science still for
a long time will try to silence whatever the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
tries to realize to everyone. So in
order that people receive a chance
of making their own mind about findings
and evidence about the origin of man,
which are indicated by this Concept
of Dipolar Gravity, in part B of this
web page is explained what exactly
this concept states. So through
reading this web page readers have
a chance to make up their own opinion
on this subject. Because from the
scientific theory named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
a new philosophy of life grew up, named
moral totalizm,
the findings and evidence presented
in part B of this web page
express
also the official stand of the
philosophy of totalizm
in the matter of origins (creation)
of man.
#A4.
Goals of this web page:
In the light of what I presented in previous
items, there is a burning need to replace
the stubbornness to-date in matters of the
origins of man, with logic and with reasoning
based on evidence and facts. To accomplish
this, the discussion between religions and
science needs to be replaced by the discussion
between adherers of two scientific theories,
namely the Darwin's theory which stands
"contra" the creation of man by God, and the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
which stands "pro" creation of man by God.
Due to such a replacement, the topic of
creation of man by God is to be
shifted from the present area of
squabble between two similarly
close-minded sides, into the area of rational
discussion about the evidential value of
arguments, logic of deductions, true state
of things, creative experience of people, etc.
Therefore, a basic goal of this web page is
to cause just such shift in accentuation of
this vital discussion
Of course, independently from the above goal,
this web page has imposed several further
goals. One of these is to indicate how the matter
of origins of man is explained by the "theory
of everything" called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
Furthermore, this web page indicates the body
of evidence which the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
accumulated in support of its findings. Another
goal of this web page is to reveal how the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity places the fact
of the creation of man by God within the entire
process of formation of our present reality,
means in relation to the process of self-evolution
of God and the later process of creation of
our physical world by God.
Part B:
Natural self-evolution of
God
and the creation of man by God:
This part of the web page explains
with a down to earth method,
where we people come from and where
we are going. It does so by presenting
a new model of the origins of the
physical world and man. This model
is a result of findings of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
It is completely opposite to the model
of so-called "Big Bang" disseminated
by official Earth's science. Simultaneously,
the essence of it is agreeable with
the model disseminated by religions.
Only that it makes more unambiguous
and more scientific various ambiguities
which stem from wrong interpretations
of an old religious terminology by people.
#B1.
What was the course of the self-evolution of
God -
means how everything has started:
Extremely long, long ago, there was
no Earth, no Sun, no matter, no physical
world, and even no time in the form
as we know it. The entire universe
was then just an emptiness with
infinitive dimensions.
However,
according to findings of the scientific
theory called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
somewhere within this infinitive
emptiness of the universe there was
a gigantic droplet of extraordinary
liquid called counter-matter.
Counter-matter is an exact reversal
of "matter" which human science researched
so-far. Opposite to how the matter displays
attributes of mass, inertia, or friction,
this counter-matter is weightless, does
NOT show inertia, and does NOT form
any friction. Thus, it is continuously
in a state of perpetual motion. The most
vital, however, amongst these opposite
to matter attributes of counter-matter,
are the intellectual attributes. As
we know, our matter is "stupid" in
the natural state. Thus counter-matter
is intelligent. Means, counter-matter
is able to accumulate and to store
information, and to think in the natural
state. In the sense of its attributes,
this gigantic droplet of counter-matter
was a kind of liquid computer at
the beginning of times. But this
computer initially did NOT have
any program inside. The perpetually
moving counter-matter which formed
it, at the beginning of times
already formed streams and whirls
which flew thoughtlessly from one
end to the other of this gigantic
droplet of counter-matter hanging
in emptiness of the universe of
infinitive dimensions.
The above description of initial conditions
in which the self-evolution of God took
place is NOT taken from the ceiling.
In fact there is a vast body of evidence
that it was like that. If someone is
interested in this evidence, it can be
found in volumes 4 and 5 of monographs
[1/4] and
[1/5].
In order to provide here at least a
small example of this evidence, one
amongst numerous facts that the universe
is an unlimited emptiness with no
boundaries (instead of e.g. an unlimited
space filled up with galaxies), is our
imagination. According to the findings of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
we are unable to imagine anything that does
NOT exist in the universe - because such
a thing does NOT have a "name" nor a definition
in the language of the universe called ULT -
the "Universal Language of Thoughts".
(Descriptions of the ULT language are
provided in item #B4 of the separate
web page about
telepathy,
as well as in subsection I5.4 from volume
5 of monographs
[1/4] and
[1/5].)
As it turns out, no-one amongst us is able
to imagine infinitively large universe
filled up with "something", e.g. with galaxies.
But everyone without a difficulty is able
to imagine an emptiness of infinitive
dimensions.
During the initial stage of flowing
of this liquid counter-matter from
one end of the gigantic droplet into
another end of it, the counter-matter
kept learning.
After all, counter-matter
is an intelligent liquid. This learning
resulted in various kinds of natural
programs being formed inside of the
memory of this counter-matter. (This
memory for programs and data, which
is contained inside of counter-matter,
in fact forms still another separate
world, called the virtual world.
The virtual world, together with
"counter-world", and our "physical
world", is one amongst three separate
worlds of the universe. It is in this
virtual world
that God resides, means
that resides the primary program of
the universe - the evolution of which
is described in this item of the web
page. It is also this virtual world
where we all land after our physical
deaths.) These programs started to gain
self-awareness. Means, they started to
know that they do exist and that they
are they. They also learned how to move
inside of counter-matter. They gained
the means to instigate counter-matter
in which they resided into carrying out
any motion that they wanted. These
natural programs that eventuated inside
of counter-matter gradually formed a
kind of self-aware creatures. Only that
these creatures had no body, but simply
were programs that resided in liquid
and intelligent counter-matter. So these
programs could be called "spiritual beings".
With the elapse of time these spiritual
beings mutually learned about the existence
of other beings similar to themselves.
A competition started between them.
This competition gradually converted into
a fight. In this fight only one program
was the winner, which managed to destroy
or absorb all other programs similar
to itself. This only remaining program
which survived from times of the fights,
is present
God.
So the superior being which currently
is called God, is simply a single huge
self-aware program which in a natural
manner evolved inside of the intelligent
counter-matter.
There is a significant body of evidence
in support of the finding that God originates
from the process of natural evolution
described above. For example, in support
of the fact that initially several spiritual
beings come to existence, which later
fought with each other, stands the
fact of inscribing by God exactly the
same competition and fight in life of
practically every living creature.
In turn, in support of the fact that
God is a huge natural program which
self-evolved in intelligent (liquid)
counter-matter, stand the fact that
a program is a relatively easy for
self-evolving inside of an intelligent
computer which in an unaware manner
carries out some physical activities.
The detailed description of this evidence
for the self-evolution of God is provided
in item #B3 below.
After God self-evolved, he learned how
to control absolutely the behaviours of
liquid counter-matter in which he resided.
Lonely existence induced in him the longing
for creating from this counter-matter
similar creatures which would be on his
image, but which would also be inferior
towards him - so that they would not
compete with him and he would not need
to fight with them. In this manner he
come to the idea of creating the physical
world, and creating the man.
* * *
Independently from this item, the process of
the self-evolution of the second component
of God described here, means this huge
natural program which religions call the
"Holy Ghost" while the philosophy of totalizm
calls the "universal intellect", is presented
on two further web pages, namely in item
#I2 from "part I" of the separate web page
about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
and also in item #B12 of the web page about
God.
I highly recommend having a look at these
web pages. After all, they extend information
provided in this item.
#B2.
Why a "natural evolution" in fact did occur
in the universe, only that the product of it was
God
not man:
Motto:
"The existence of God is NOT at all contradictive to the official human science. It is the
official human science that still insist to remain in contradiction against truth and reality."
I wonder whether the reader ever asked
himself a question as to "what has a greater
chance to happen just by a pure accident -
something that is simple, or something that
is complicated"? For example, let us assume
that there is already a self-learning computer,
and also an empty ocean. What is to happen
first just by a pure chance, i.e. a program is
to appear first in this self-learning computer,
or a living creature is to appear first in this empty
ocean. I thought already about this problem.
In my opinion, the more simple something is,
the greater chance it has to happen by a pure
chance. After all, everything that is complicated
requires the simultaneous appearance of a
much larger number of phenomena that are working
for the benefit of it. Therefore, for example dropping
down a coconut from a coconut palm and hitting
someone into head has a much higher chance
of accidental occurrence than someone's climbing
a coconut palm and splitting his head there by
accidental hitting a coconut. So if this logical
finding we relate to the previous question
about what is to appear first: a program in
a self-learning computer, or a creature in
an empty ocean, the reply must be a program.
The reason is that a program is incomparably
simpler in the structure than even a simplest living
creature. A walking proof of this fact are present
scientists. After all, almost every present scientist
is able to make programs for a computer.
But in fact no present scientist on Earth is able
to synthesize from a zero even a smallest
blade of a most primitive grass.
The question from previous paragraph has
a huge merit in the matter of origins of man.
In fact, the reply to it conclusively confirms that
humans do NOT originate from the process of
a purely accidental evolution, but in fact were
created by
God.
But simultaneously it is God who originates from
an accidental evolution of the same type which
present scientists attribute to the origins of man.
The logical and evidential basis from which the
finding was deducted that God himself
originates from a natural evolution, in turn
after he come to existence this God created
initially the physical world, and then man,
are described more comprehensively in
"part I" of the separate web page about
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
I recommend this web page to readers who
are interested in a deeper investigation of
this matter. At this point it suffices to explain,
that God is a huge program which in a
completely natural manner evolved inside
of a "liquid computer" called "counter-matter.
This character of God as a huge natural
program contained inside of self-learning
and thinking counter-matter is explained
in more details on the separate web page about
God.
In turn, being a huge program, God represents
a simple structure which is much less complicated
than any living tissues. As such a simple structure,
God had a much larger probability than a living
creature to evolve in a natural (accidental)
evolution. In turn, when God once came to
existence, then all the further accidental
evolution ceased to happen. This is because
everything that came to existence after God,
was intelligently and purposely designed and
then created by this already existing God.
After all, God had no difficulty with creating
even the most structurally complicated physical
world as well as man. The process of evolution
of God, and the later creation of the physical
world and humans by this God, is described
more comprehensively in the abovementioned
"part I" of the separate web page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
But because the reader may not have an
access to this separate web page, repeated
below are most vital descriptions from it.
#B3.
Sources of our difficulties with acceptance
of the above model of natural self-evolution of
God,
together with examples of evidence for the
correctness of this model:
Motto:
"In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God. He was
with God in the beginning.
Through him all things were
made; without him nothing was
made that has been made. In
him was life, and that life
was the light of men. The
light shines in the darkness,
but the darkness has not understood
it. There came a man who was
sent from God; his name was John."
(Quotation from the
Bible, John 1:1-14.)
The majority of people have significant
difficulties with logical and comprehensive
acceptance of anything that differs
from their habits, that runs against
their interests, that is based on the
existence of infinity, etc. Therefore,
in the model and explanation provided
before for the natural self-evolution
of God, the majority of people is to
reject this explanation under the excuse
that it contains infinity. But real
sources of this rejection are going
to originate from any amongst following
facts:
(i)
Thinking in finite categories.
Everything that surrounds us and that
we can examine with the use of our
senses, has a finite character. Means
everything has a beginning and an end,
limited size, specific duration, etc.
Therefore, the majority of people acquire
the habit of thinking exclusively
in finite categories. So if we tell
such people, that something is infinitively
large, or is lasting infinitively,
then they ask curiously "but what
is behind this". In turn when we
inform them that something lasts
infinitively long, such people ask,
"but what was before it", or "what
is to be after that". On the other
hand, the existence of infinity is
a fact. It exists in mathematics.
It also exists in our imagination
(e.g. the majority of us can imagine
infinitively long life, or infinitively
long love). It also exists in the
reality of the universe. The infinitively
wide universe is a fact and in order
to understand it one needs to just
shift his or her thinking to the
category of infinity. In turn when
someone gets into the considerations
of the type presented in previous
item, then such a someone never
would be able to reach any valid
conclusions unless accepts the
existence of infinity. Without
accepting it, he or she is going
to trot in one place, unproductively
trying to solve a dilemma "what
was earlier - an egg or a hen".
(After all, in the finite world
before an egg a hen must exist,
while before a hen an egg needed
to be. Only in the infinitive universe
which includes God, one can precisely
define that after all an egg needed
to be created first - means program
and information, and only then a hen
could develop from this egg.)
(ii)
Religious indoctrination. This indoctrination
pre-programmed all faithful with the
belief that it was God that existed
infinitively long, not some "gigantic
droplet of counter-matter". The problem
is only, that this indoctrination does
NOT explain which precisely amongst
God's Trinity existed infinitively
long, namely whether it was God Father,
or Holy Ghost, or perhaps God Son -
after all according to Christianity
God is composed out of these three
Holy Parts. People deeply religious,
for which God is the matter of faith,
not the matter of knowledge, will reject
the previous explanations on the basis
that supposedly these contradict their
religious upbringing. Of course, they
will be wrong in this. After all, if
one analyses carefully explanations from
the previous item about the self-evolution
of God, then it turns out that these
explanations state exactly the same as
every religion does. Only that they do
this much more precisely and that they
explain everything in terms of logic
and knowledge, not in terms of belief.
After all, they explain that the
component of God which by Christianity
is called "God Father" or "Ancient
of Days" (means "counter-matter")
in fact existed infinitively long -
means always. To the evolution was
subjected only this component of God
which Christianity calls "Holy Ghost"
or the "Word" - means the natural program
that resides inside of this counter-matter.
So the rejection of the previous explanations
on the basis of religious indoctrination
is simply fighting about terminology
without analysis the merit of the matter.
(iii)
Suppressing the findings of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity by
makers of evil.
A serious problem with the free
dissemination of findings of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
is that a powerful terrorist-occupational
organization acts secretly on the Earth,
the existence of which this concept reveals.
This organization with all power and at any
cost tries to suppress, hold back, scoff,
neutralize, sabotage, scare, silence, or
overpower with noise, the dissemination
of this concept. Thus such sections of
this concept which still manage to
break through barriers that this organization
raises, are vigorously fought out. This
fighting is clearly visible in the
smearing campaign which is currently
carried out in internet about this concept.
Because of the action of the above factors,
the model of the development of the universe
and the evolution of God, explained
previously in item #B1, meets a lot of irrational
and sinister resistance on the path,
before it is able to break through to
the awareness of humans. Fortunately
for this model, there is a sufficient
body of evidence which confirms the
correctness of it, and the agreeability
of it with truth. Therefore, for the use
of these readers who wish to cement their
rational knowledge, or who need evidence
in order to defend the model presented
here against attacks of e.g. the "makers
of evil", I am going to provide below at
least the most representative examples of
this evidence. Here are the most known
examples of it:
(1)
Information contained in religions which
confirm the correctness of the model
provided here. In spite that
these are highly religious people
who have significant reluctance to
accepting the self-evolution of God,
actually in statements of religions
the highest number of confirmations
of the correctness of the model
described here is contained. The
only problem is, that so-far
there
was no key for a correct
interpretation of these information -
such as e.g. the key provided
presently to us by the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity. Therefore,
people interpreted these information
in a wrong manner. Let us list below
several amongst such confirming
statements of religions, together
with explanations how one should
interpret them:
(1a)
"In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God. He was
with God in the beginning.
Through him all things were
made; without him nothing was
made that has been made. In
him was life, and that life
was the light of men. The
light shines in the darkness,
but the darkness has not understood
it. There came a man who was
sent from God; his name was John."
(Quotation from the Bible, John 1:1-14.)
In times when religions were formed,
people did NOT know present terminology
such as "program" or "computer".
So in order to express somehow,
that on the very beginning of
everything a "program" come to
the existence, they needed to
use a different terminology that
was known to them, and that was
closest to the idea of program.
This closest term was "word" -
means information, means algorithm
and program.
(1b)
"God exists as a Holy Trinity" (in three parts).
Means, even the Christian religion
clearly distinguishes counter-matter
(means "God Father" or the "Ancient
of Days" - i.e. a liquid computer
in which the program of God resides),
from the natural program of God
(means from "Holy Ghost"), and from
the physical world which was created
by this God (means from "God Son").
Simultaneously, the same religion
does NOT distinguishes such three
components in human beings. So this
religion behaves exactly the same
as present scientists do. After all
scientists also distinguish hardware,
software, and peripherals in present
computers. But they do not wish
to recognize the presence of these
three components e.g. in people
or in animals.
(1c)
"God always existed". (Ps 45:7)
The model described here states
exactly the same as religions do,
namely that "God existed since
eternity". Only that the model
makes this statement even more
clear and unambiguous. This is
because it informs that for eternity
existed this component of God,
which is called "God Father" or
the "Ancient of Days" by
Christianity and which is
called the "liquid (universal)
computer" or the "gigantic droplet
of counter-matter" by the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity.
(1d)
"God created the world and man".
This in turn means, that before the
creation of the world and man God
was incomplete - he had NO the part
which was created later. In turn such
an incompleteness means, that God
learns, develops, and gets more
perfect as time elapses. In turn his
learning and development means that
there was a time when God had no
knowledge yet that is required for
God, means that when his self-evolution
as God was started.
(2)
The existence of words and definition
in the ULT language, which confirm the
correctness of the explanation provided
previously. In spite that our
thinking habits block us from accepting
the fact that something (e.g. the universe)
exists since infinitively long time
and had no beginnings not end, on the
level of our intuition - which utilizes
definitions and words from the ULT
language, such an infinitive existence
of the universe is easily acceptable.
In a similar manner our intuition accepts
also other infinitive concepts, such as
infinitive love, infinitive existence
of our soul, or the possibility of
infinitively long life after people
overcome the deaths. So in order to
understand the fact of infinitively
long existence of the universe together
with this initial gigantic droplet of
counter-matter, we need to resort to
our imagination with our intuition,
means to definitions contained in the
ULT language.
(3)
The existence of the evidence which indicates
that God continually improves himself and the
entire universe. In turn if God continually
improves himself, this means, that there must
be such a moment in time, when his knowledge
was near zero, means when still there was NO
this component of God which increases his
knowledge. In turn the fact that God continually
increases his knowledge is indicated by a whole
range of evidence. Some examples of this
evidence include, amongst others:
(3a)
The structure of "timespace".
This structure is so designed, that
God can continually re-program it.
This in turn means, that God continually
learns - means that his knowledge
does NOT remain on the same level
all the time. In turn when he learns,
he introduces subsequent improvements
to the "timespace". (This "timespace"
is described more comprehensively on
web pages about
time vehicles and about
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
(3b)
The manner on which God shaped the
physical world. This manner
indicates that the intention of
God was continuous improvement of
this world. Only the need for such
improvement justifies why in the
physical world there are such
things as suffering, illnesses,
death, evil,
devilish UFOnauts, etc.
(3c)
The fact that every truth needs to
break through the sea of false.
In this way God tests the value of
this truth. In turn the only reason
which logically explains the need
of carrying out an infinitive number
of such tests, is the requirement of
learning and increasing the knowledge.
(3d)
The imposing the need for improvement
onto the imperfection of man. God
created a highly imperfect man. But he
could create a perfect man. This means
that the imperfection of man contains
a requirement of continuous improvement
and learning being imposed onto it.
(3e)
The need of learning and perfecting may
be for God a condition of his survival.
After all, on our level of knowledge it
is not known whether in the huge emptiness
of the universe do NOT exist similar although
different gigantic droplets of counter-matter
which also generated superior beings analogous
to our God. So it cannot be excluded that a
situation may raise, when our God will be
confronted with one of such beings.
(4)
The existence of a body of evidence which directly
confirms the infinitive existence of the "gigantic
droplet of counter-matter suspended in infinitive
empty space". Here are most commonly known
examples of such evidence:
(4a)
The symbol if infinity (i.e. digit eight in a
horizontal position). As this is explained
in item #D6 of a separate web page about
telepathy,
our civilization repetitively receives telepathic
messages from other totaliztic civilizations of
a higher from people level of technical advancement.
In old times such messages used to be called
"divine revelations", while in present times
these are called "automatic writings" or
"messages from contactees". In these messages
humanity receives knowledge, which on our low
level of advancement humanity still is unable
to work out just be itself. One amongst such
information send to us in a telepathic manner,
was the information about the infinity of
the universe, and also the symbol of infinity.
This symbol turns out to be a "lying digit eight".
As every person is able to verify it easily,
this symbol models trajectories along which
the circulation of information (e.g. the circulation
of natural programs) must take place inside
of such a finite "gigantic droplet of
counter-matter" that hovers within the infinitive
emptiness of the universe and subdivided into
the physical world and the counter-world. On
the other hand, if this "gigantic droplet of
counter-matter" has a shape that differs from
a kind of gigantic droplet of finite dimensions,
for example it has spread infinitively and
had no end, then the symbol of infinity would
also be different - for example would take a
forms of lying X letter instead of the lying
digit eight.
(4b)
The "Ancient of Days" from the Christian religion.
In the Christian tradition, for example
in the Bible, an information is recorded
that one only component of God existed
infinitively long. The most correct name
of this component translated into English
as the "Ancient of Days". References to
to this component are, amongst others, in
the Bible - see Daniel 7:9, 7:13, and 7:22.
But more exact interpretations of this
component of God require other old-Christian
sources to be researched, for example old
psalms from Presbyterian Church. These more
exact interpretations of the name the "Ancient
of Days" for the "infinitively old droplet
of counter-matter" are presented in subsection
S5 from volume 14 of monograph
[1/4].
(5)
The existence in the model described before
a similar number of elements of infinity,
as are also contained in every other explanation
for the problem of origins of the world and man
that are known to humanity.
Whatever explanation for the origins of universe
one would consider, always it is going to have
the same problem of "what was before it".
Also always some point of this explanation
must suggest the "infinity". Such a problem
appears immediately if someone carefully
analyses e.g. the imprecise religious
explanation that "always there was God"
(but not explaining which exactly component
of God did existed since infinity). After
all, without the acceptance of infinity
immediately a question emerges of the type
"did this infinitively existing God had
always the entire knowledge that He has
since the very beginning", "if God existed
since eternity, then why He needed to
create the physical world and man, instead
these also had to exist infinitively",
"if God created man, why He did it so
relatively recent", "what God was doing
before He created the physical world and
people", etc., etc. It is also going to be
like this in case of the claims of present
Earth's science, that at the very beginning
was a "Big Bang". After all, also then
inquisitive people are going to ask questions
of the type "what was before the Big Bang",
"what caused the Big Bang", "where this
entire energy and mass of the Big Bang came
from", "what lies behind borders of the
expanding Universe", "why each one out
of supposed "evidence" for the Big Bang
can also be interpreted as an evidence
for the self-evolution of God", etc., etc.
Therefore, the inability to accept an
infinitive existence of the "gigantic
droplet of counter-matter" boils down
to the revealing exactly the same thinking
habits, which in other people generate
the inability to accept an infinitive
existence of readily-formed God, or
impossibility to accept the Big Bang.
In fact, whatever someone would postulate
that something existed infinitively long,
always these people whose minds are working
exclusively in categories of trivial
habits of finite physical world, try
to undermine his statement by asking
"but what created this something that
existed from the very beginning".
Therefore the key for finding an
explanation for the origins of the
physical world and man, that is
holding truth, is NOT the avoidance
of considering a form of infinity
in this explanation. The considering
of infinity cannot be avoided. After
all, infinity is a component and a
true reality of the universe. So the
key is to find such a scenario and model,
which contains an infinity in itself,
but which simultaneously has the highest
probability of taking place in practice,
and the correctness of which is supported
by the greatest number of evidence.
(6)
The scenario and model described
previously in item #B1 has the highest probability
to take place in reality.
If one considers all possible
scenarios and models of the creation
of world and man which include
infinity inside of themselves, then
some amongst them are going to have
greater chances of being true from
others. These more correct must display
two attributes, namely (1) they must
be supported by the greatest number
of evidence, and (2) they must have
the highest probability of occurring
in reality. In fact the scenario and
model of origins of physical world
and man described in this part of
the web page is supported by the
highest number of items of evidence.
It also is the most agreeable with
the known principles of the operation
of universe. Thus this scenario and
model has the highest probability of
taking place in reality out of all
scenarios known to humanity so-far.
#B4.
Why
God
created firstly the physical
world and then the man:
The chief goal of God is to increase his
own knowledge and to cause the continuous
development of the universe to ever more
perfect form. But no development is possible
if whatever is to be developed does not
interact with something different. So in
order to increase his own knowledge, and
to cause the development of the universe,
God decided to create something that is
completely different from himself. This
something that God created was the
physical world in which we live, and
also intelligent beings which inhabit
this physical world - means us, people.
After the creation of the physical world
and people, God can now increase his
knowledge through carrying out on us various
experiments and then watching what happens
in the result of these experiments.
Of course, while creating the physical
world and humans, God still remembered
his unpleasant experience from the past.
After all, at the beginning of his
existence he was forced to fight for the
domination over the universe with a similar
to him perfect and timeless spiritual
beings. Therefore God decided to design
us and our world in such a manner, that
we fulfill several requirements that he
imposed onto his creation. Some of these
requirements included:
(1)
Imperfection and unreliability.
In order to maintain his superiority
and advantage over us and over our
world, God created our world and us
as imperfect and unreliable.
(2)
Of a limited lifespan. Means our
time is predefined and limited.
Motto:
"Absolutely everything in the entire universe is only a manifestation
of intelligent counter-matter and natural programs which reside in this
counter-matter and which control behaviours of it."
In order to create the physical world and man,
God completed 6-phases long process of
creation, which briefly is described in the Bible
(see the Book of Genesis, 1:1-31).
Unfortunately, the biblical description of the
process of creation uses a very archaic
language, and also is very brief. For example,
in times when it was written, by the word
"earth" was understood both the "chemical
elements" as well as "soil". In turn the world
"water" was then describing the extraordinary
liquid from the counter-world, which the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
calls the "counter-matter", as well as
the real water from our physical world.
In the biblical descriptions the same
words are used in various sentences in
such drastically different meanings.
Therefore, in order to really understand
how the creation of the physical world
and man was carried out by God, it is
necessary to translate biblical descriptions
into the present scientific terminology.
This translation is published on the
abovementioned web
page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
(see there "part I"). But because the
reader may not have an access to this
separate web page, repeated below are
most vital descriptions from it. So
here are the subsequent phases of this
six-stage process of the creation of
physical world and the evolution of
humans - if these phases are described
with the use of present terminology.
(1)
The creation of the earth and light.
The first phase of the creation of our
physical world that fulfils the
requirements
and conditions described in previous item
#B3, required development of natural
programs which transformed liquid
counter-matter from the counter-world
into solid matter from our world.
Counter-matter is an intelligent everlasting
liquid, which exists infinitively long, and
which is in perpetual motion. So it was
necessary to so transform this counter-matter,
that it would displays attributes which
are exactly opposite to natural attributes
of this extraordinary liquid. Therefore
these natural programs which God then
developed, needed to cause such behaviour
of counter-matter, that attributes of this
liquid were reversed into exactly opposite.
The effect of reversing of attributes of
counter-matter God accomplished through
such re-programming it, that it formed
two opposite kinds of semi-permanent
whirls. These whirls are described
under the names of "low-pressure whirls"
and "high-pressure whirls" on separate
web pages about
hurricanes and about
tornados,
as well as in subsection H4.2 from volume
4 of monograph
[1/4].
Due to such a reprogramming, the continually
moving counter-matter formed semi-permanent
objects in the form of such whirls. In turn
from these whirls controlled by such natural
programs, liquid counter-matter which obeyed
these programs formed semi-permanent "objects"
representing
all chemical elements (means
"earth" - as in old terminology these elements
were called), and also
software "objects"
which represented all basic phenomena of
the physical world (means - mainly various
kinds of electromagnetic radiation, or
"light"). Thus "earth" and "light" were
formed from such natural programs and
from counter-matter which implemented
commands contained in these programs.
These "objects" are simply natural programs
and appropriate clusters of whirls of
liquid counter-matter which implement
the content of these programs. Their
description is provided, amongst others,
in item #G4 on the web page on the Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
and also on a separate web page about
time vehicles,
where these objects are explained as basic components
of the so-called "space time". In general, these
"objects" can be compared to objects from
present OOP (i.e. "Object-Oriented Programming),
e.g. to an object of a "button" which appears
on the screen of our computer. This is because
these "objects" are very similar to such computer
images (e.g. the image of a "button"). For example,
on a computer screen such a "button" look as
if it is a solid form, on which one can implement
various manipulations, e.g. can shift it into a different
area of the screen, change colour of it, enlarge
or shrink it, etc. But in reality this button is still
a program and an image formed by this program
with the computer's hardware. Similarly these
"objects" formed from natural programs contained
in counter-matter, and from images formed by
hardware of this counter-matter, also look as if
the are solid, they can be subjected to manipulation
and shifting, etc.
(2)
The creation of a dome which divides two fluids (waters).
After God created the semi-permanent matter and
basic physical phenomena of the physical world
from whirls of liquid counter-matter, God decided
to separate this matter and these physical
phenomena, from counter-matter and from phenomena
of the counter-world. He accomplished this
separation through placing the matter and
physical phenomena inside of a completely
separate world. In this way God created
then an entire "physical world" - which
the Christian religion calls
God Son.
(This is a very accurate name, considering that
this religion calls "God Father" the counter-world,
while it calls "Holy Ghost" the natural program of
the so-called "universal intellect" that evolved
inside of the "virtual world". This virtual world
is simply the "program storing" capability of
counter-matter.) Then God created an impenetrable
barrier which separates this physical
world from the counter-world. Through this barrier
almost nothing can pass, apart from these natural
programs that reside in the counter-matter.
Although in the description provided here this
second phase of the creation of the physical
world may appear to be a simple and easy,
in fact it required the carrying out the complete
reconfiguration of the counter-world. After all,
every object from the physical world received
then its counter-material duplicate in the counter-world.
Furthermore, the maintaining of the existence
of this impenetrable barrier between both worlds,
and also the software communication through
this barrier, required the preparation of a huge
amount of indescribably complex software,
which maintains the cooperation of both worlds
while physically separating them from each other.
(3)
The clarification of lands and seas and the evolution of plants.
After the separation and enveloping the physical world
with the use of appropriate software, God began to
define, using a different kind of software, the subsequent
laws that prevail in this physical world. These laws gradually
allowed God to subdivide matter into different consistencies
of gases, liquids, and solid matter, separate these
kinds of matter from each other, and also begun
to experiment with creating first living organisms -
which by the nature of things needed to belong
to plants during that phase of creation.
(4)
The creation of stars and planets.
After the laws established by God for the physical
world were programmed out and tested, God
decided to enlarge and extend the developed
then (small) prototype of the physical world.
This enlargement and extension depended
on the creation of an entire present physical
world and the entire "time space". In this way
the volume of the entire universe was formed,
which included all stars, galaxies, planets, etc.
(5)
The creation and evolution of living beings in seas.
After the basic principles of work and development
of plants were mastered, God began to gradually
introduce and evolve various animals. At the
beginning he did it mainly within waters of oceans.
(6)
The creation and evolution of land animals and a gradual
creation of human beings. After all details
of genetic codes and principles of evolution were
programmed and tested, God finally could
proceed with gradual development of increasingly
more perfect land animals. In the final stage he
could also evolve human beings. How he accomplished
the evolution of humans it is explained in further
parts of this web page about the
evolution of man.
It is worth to notice, that
God
accumulated in man that he created the
essence of an entire experience from the
process of God's own evolution. For example,
a human child immediately after the birth is like
a self-programming, intelligent counter-matter
was in times before God evolved in it. After
all, a child is like an empty, self-programming
computer. Only the later life of this child
is to program into it the knowledge of an adult human.
In turn the mutual contradiction between the
persuading people by their numerous feelings,
to do whatever later is going to turn bad for
them, and simultaneous logical letting them
know by their organ of conscience what later
turns out to be good for them, is a memory written
into people and expressing the fight between good and
numerous forms of evil, which (the fight) at the very
beginning of his existence God was forced to
complete with other intellects similar to him
that also evolved in the counter-matter almost
simultaneously with God. In turn the principle
that "ontogenesis repeats the filogenesis' way",
(i.e. that the "development of an individual
repeats the development of the entire specie") -
described in item #C2 (5) of this web page about the
evolution of humans,
is an illustrative demonstration to people of the
entire history of their species.
(7)
Rest? Although the Bible calls "resting" the
present, seventh phase of the creation of the
physical world, in fact God all the time is perfecting
his creation. This perfecting is possible, because
the software of the so-called "time space"
(described amongst others in item #G4 on the web page on the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity)
was so wisely accomplished by him, that it
allows to introduce continuous improvements
to practically everything that God wishes to improve.
In turn, after any such an improvements is introduced,
immediately the power of this improvement
is extended to the entire "time space". On the
basis of watching what happens in the universe
and on the Earth, I am reasoning that God
currently experiments with a self-perfecting
organization of so-called "human swarms".
Such a "human swarm" is simply any civilization
composed of a huge number of imperfect humans
and living in separation from other similar
civilizations. "Human swarm" differs from
insect swarms or animal flocks - the advantages
of which over individual creatures God already
experimentally tested long ago. Namely, human
swarm does NOT have a "queen", while
all participants of it obtained approximately
similar characteristics and rights, and all of
them obtained the free will. The present
goal of God seem to be the development of
a system of moral and social laws, which are
going to cause that such a "human swarm"
as whole can become a creation much better
than each single member of it. (In other
words, God tries to improve the physical
world in such a manner, that these
"human swarms" which live according
to laws established by God, as whole
become much better quality in every
aspect than is each person constituting
such a swarm considered separately.)
After all, only by such a kind of experiments
various facts can be explained, e.g. a fact
that God created conditions on the Earth
in which the goodness and morality must
break free through barriers placed in front
of them by
evil doers,
or the fact that in recent times a clear drop in
level of average intelligence and average
perfection can be noticed, as it occurs both
in people and also in human
relatives from the space.
(For example, the present generation is at
average significantly less intelligent and decisively
less perfect than was in average the generation
which lived only around 50 years ago.)
I will not mention here, that this present
goal of God, as usual, runs against all
believes of Earthly scientists who claim
that "a whole is always as good as the
weakest link of it". Unfortunately, as always,
orthodox scientists who spread these kinds
of claims do not take under consideration
the experience of God in making impossible
accomplishable.
God created man in the last (sixth)
phase of the creation of physical
world. After all, in order to create
man, God had to firstly accumulate
the appropriate body of experience,
means carry out an infinitive number
of empirical experiments. The
creation of man God carried out
on the already non-existent planet
called "Terra" - located within the
Vega system in "Lute" (Polish "Lutnia")
star constellation.
(The description of this planet
is provided in the Polish treatise
[3b],
and also summarised in subsection V3
from volume 16 of the English version
of monograph
[1/4].)
Then God destroyed
this planet, in order to not deprive
people the free will of speculating
about their origins. But the destruction
of the planet Terra was carried
out only after the humanity managed
to spread around the universe,
carrying with them onto other
planets also all other vegetation
and animals that God created
earlier on Terra. All intelligent
beings from the present universe
are currently descendants of these
first people created by God on
the planet Terra.
Similarly as in the process of creation
of every other living creature, also in
the process of creation of man God used
experiences which he accumulated previously
in an empirical manner. These experiences
God had written down in the form of so-called
"genetic code" - means a kind of "programming
language" which God uses for expressing
details of design and attributes of a
given creature. As this is going to be
explained in further parts of this web
page, the creation of man was carried
out by God through slight alterations
of the genetic code taken from the
water-land creatures which already existed
before man - and which we know from
mythology under the name of "sirens".
Unfortunately, this creature got extinct
completely on Earth a long time ago.
But because sirens were an improved
version of whales and dolphins, after
it got extinct on Earth the whales and
dolphins remained the only still alive
animal relatives of humans.
It is worth to notice here, that the process of
creation of man did not end on the phase number
6 described in the Bible, but lasts until today.
At this moment God implements phase 7
which is mentioned in the Bible, but to which
people usually refer as to a "rest". However, in
reality the present phase 7 of creation of man
is in fact the experimentation regarding "human
swarms". (These "human swarms" are kinds
of huge group organisms, which opposite to
insect swarms and to flocks of animals, are
composed of individuals who have the so-called
"free will" and also have the ability to think logically.)
The goal of this present experimentation of
God is to create such conditions, in which
these "human swarms" live and develop
themselves in such a manner that as a
whole each of them displays much better
qualities than the quality of every individual
member of these swarms. It is worth to notice,
that at the time when the present, 7th phase
of the creation of man finishes with a success,
God is going to initiate the 8th phase. It is to
be the transformation of best human swarms
into gods who are permitted to create their
own worlds. (In that 8th phase the human
swarms who are NOT meeting the quality
requirements imposed by God are to be
annihilated. After all, they will not be needed
any more.) Further details on this subject
are explained in item #I4 of the separate
web page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
Knowing how and from what we are created,
we are able to define now who, or what, we
humans actually are. So here is the definition
of us, humans, provided by the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity: "a name human is assigned
to a pyramid of natural programs which reside
in counter-matter and which shape this counter-matter
into a pyramid of structures and manifestations
that we perceive as our self-awareness, conscience,
history, body, and our sensual perceptions".
To explain this in other words, we humans,
in fact are in over 99% just kinds of natural
programs - similar like these in present computers.
Means over 99% of us is just information.
Then less than 1% of us is this continually
moving and everlasting, computer-like liquid
called "counter-matter", which these natural
programs shape into forms of various physical
structures that constitute our physical body.
The variety of these structures made of
counter-matter includes miniature toroidal
whirls described in subsection H4.2 of [1/5],
or in item #3 of the web page about
hurricanes -
several of which must cling together to compose
a single elementary particle, then it includes also
elementary particles, atoms, molecules, tissues,
etc., up until forming our entire physical body
and our senses. Illustratively we could
explain ourselves as a kind of computer
which is formed from a specially obedient
intelligent liquid, and thus which can take
any shape, any color, and any operation
that programs contained inside of it order
it to take.
The above explanation realizes to us that we in
fact are composites combined from as many as
three separate components. The first of these
components is our physical body. Because
of the close similarity between our own design and
operation, and the design and operation of present
computers, the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
compares our physical bodies to a picture which
is formed on screens of present computers - and
which can be perceived by our physical senses.
In fact, similarly as these pictures on screens of
present computers, our physical body as such
does NOT exists at all - it is just an illusion formed
in a software manner and posted to us via our
software senses. Our second component
is the counter-body which is formed from
the eternally existing and continually moving
liquid called "counter-matter". This counter-body
in fact does exist. However, it represents less
than 1% of what we really are. The main task
of it is to act as a computer memory which stores
programs of our soul.
Finally the most vital our component is the
most important natural program which stands
on the very top of this pyramid of programs that
is called a “human”. It is this program that religions
call the soul. This program contains our
self-awareness and our memory. More about
the natural program of "soul" is explained in
subsection I5.2 from volume 5 of monograph
[1/5].
Everything that does exist can be proven. Therefore
we people are able to prove that we have these
three components of ourselves listed above, i.e.
that we have: (1) a physical body, (2) a counter-body,
and (3) a soul. The proof for having the physical
body does NOT need to be shown here - it suffices
that we just "pinch" ourselves to know that our
physical senses confirm the software existence
of our body. The fact, however, that we also have
a counter-body should be proven formally. For the
appropriate proof suffices the one presented in
subsection H1.1.4 from volume 4 of monograph
[1/5],
and also in item #D3 from the web page about the Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
In turn the formal scientific proof for the existence of
eternal soul is presented in item #C1.1 from the web page about nirvana,
and also in subsection I5.2.1 from volume 5 of monograph
[1/5].
The above descriptions and explanations, but
provided from a different point of view, are also
presented in item #C1 from the web page about nirvana.
#B6.2.
A formal scientific proof of
totalizm
which confirms that "God created the couple of first people",
formulated according to principles of mathematical logic:
Formal scientific proofs are logical structures
which were developed according to a system
of very strict logical rules. They prove the truth
of specific theorems. These proofs turn our
believes into certainty. In the sense of their
character they are equivalents of physical
equations, only that instead of being formulated
and transformed in the form of mathematical
symbols, proofs are formulated from worded
assertions. The development of formal proofs
is extremely difficult and risky. This is because
apart from the need to fulfill rigorous logical principles
and also fulfill proving requirements, proofs additionally
carry in themselves the authority of the prover.
So if they contain an error, and thus someone
invalidates them in a rational (expert) manner,
then this someone invalidates also the authority
of the prover. Therefore today such proofs are
being developed only in some areas of human
knowledge, such as mathematics or physics -
where for a long time exists a large pool of basic
proofs on which further proofs can be based.
But there are areas of human knowledge, e.g.
biology, astronomy, or religion, which so-far had
none formal proofs. So these areas
do NOT have initial pools of basic certainties,
on which further proofs could be based. Therefore,
these areas of human knowledge in fact are
composites of assumptions and speculations,
not reliable areas of science.
Nothing is known for sure in them. Also in them
officially are disseminated various outrageous,
strange, erroneous, and separated from real life
speculations of the type of the supposed "theory"
of random ("natural") evolution, or the "theory"
of pulsating universe and escaping galaxies,
or wild claims of adherers of atheism, etc., etc.
After all, everything that is claimed in these
areas, according to local tradition does NOT
require to be proved. The formulation of proofs
is especially difficult for these areas. After all,
people who are attracted to these areas,
love chaos and wild speculations, thus do
NOT wish anyone tries to introduce order
and accountability to whatever they are claiming.
The proof that I am going to present here belongs
just to these areas.
In 2007, during my
professorship at a university in South Korea,
I had a special honor, and simultaneously a special
responsibility, to develop, to publish, and to disseminate
four formal proofs, each one of which is extremely
important both, individually to each one of us, and
collectively to the entire our civilization. One of
these is the formal proof presented below for the
creation by God the first couple of people, i.e.
the first woman and the first man. This proof is
a component in a set of four similar formal proofs.
These four formal proofs include: (1) the proof
for the existence of the "counter-world" (i.e. another
world inhabited by God and by our souls) - which
(the proof) is presented in subsection H1.1.4
from volume 4 of monograph
[1/5]
and also in item #D3 from the web page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
(2) the formal proof for the existence of God - presented
in subsection I3.3.4 from volume 5 of monograph
[1/5]
and also in item #B3 of the web page about
God,
(3) the formal proof from here, which proves the creation
by God of the first woman and the first man - presented
below and also in subsection I1.4.2 from volume 5 of monograph
[1/5],
and (4) the formal proof that people have
eternal souls - presented in subsection
I5.2.1 from volume 5 of monograph
[1/5]
and also in item #C1.1 of the web page about
nirvana.
In the descriptions that follow a full version of
the formal proof for the creation by God of the
first couple of people is presented. But before
I formulate this proof, a few more words of this
introduction.
The formal scientific proof for the creation by God
the first woman and the first man, was developed
in initial days of October 2007, when I was on
my professorship at a university in Southern
Korea. This proof was carried out with methods
of mathematical logic. It is based on the well-known
assertion (fact), that in order a given species
of creatures can multiply further all by themselves,
they need to exist as at least two representatives
of this species, namely - in case of people, as at
least one woman and one man. (In case of other
creatures, as at least one female and one male -
e.g. one cow and one bull, one hen and one rooster,
one sow (pig) and one hog, etc., etc.) The fact of
this simultaneous creation by God as many as two
creatures from each species, is so important that
it is especially confirmed in the Bible - see the Genesis, 1:27
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."
In turn the so-called "natural" (i.e. completely
random) evolution, which is promoted by present
science to explain the origins of humans, is only
able to cause a rapid appearance of a single
creature of new species, not two simultaneously.
Thus, in case of people, this "natural-random evolution"
could only cause the appearance of a single male,
or a single female, not both simultaneously. (The
probability that both would appear simultaneously
and rapidly, combined with the speed of evolutionary
changes in nature observed presently (which
is indistinguishable from zero), is so low that it
excludes any such appearance within the duration
of existence of present universe.) In turn just a
single individual would NOT be able to multiply
further just by itself. So such a "natural evolution"
in NO case could be able to give beginnings
for new species of living creatures.
So here it is, the entire formal proof for the
creation by God the first woman and the
first man, completed with the use of methods
of mathematical logic:
Theorem:
"The first woman and the first man were created by God."
Basis propositions:
(1)
Speaking just theoretically, every new species
of living creatures, including humans, could be
initiated either by the appearance of just one
such a new creature, or by the appearance of
a couple of new creatures. The fact that practically
all species of living creatures that populate the
Earth are able to multiply further by themselves
only when there exists simultaneously a couple
of them, means a male and a female, eliminates
completely the possibility that at the very beginning
could appear just a single such a new creature,
instead of the required couple, e.g. just one person
instead of a couple of people which included a man
and a woman - capable of further multiplying just
by themselves.
(2) The simultaneous appearance of a couple
of people, i.e. the first male and the first female,
could either happen in a rapid manner,
i.e. this couple of new people appeared rapidly
in its final form which differed significantly from
the nearest creatures that are related to it, or
in the smooth manner, i.e. this couple
was shaped gradually over a significant period
of time, from other creatures that are related to
it. The fact that scientists neither are able to find
any evidence for the existence of intermediate
forms between humans and other creatures
which could be close relatives of humans,
or that in present times the science was unable
to find even a single example of a full cycle of
such a smooth transformation of one species
of creatures into another species of creatures,
eliminates completely the possibility of a smooth
evolution of humans and proves conclusively that
the first couple of humans appeared on the Earth
in a "rapid manner" - i.e. rapidly and without any
intermediate forms.
(3) The first couple of people, means the first female
and the first male, either evolved randomly ("naturally"),
or this couple was created by God. The fact that
the first couple of people appeared rapidly eliminates
completely the possibility that the people originate
from a random ("natural") evolution.
(Explanation complementing this 3rd set of premises:
if the appearance of the first couple of people, means
the first woman and the first man, and also the appearance
of the first couple of any other living creatures, originates
from a "natural" (random) evolution, then it would display
the presence of a whole range of attributes, which in spite
of intense searches the human science was unable to
locate. For example, (a) it would leave traces in the form
of a whole array of the intermediate forms between the
starting species and the finishing species - while such
traces are absent on the Earth NOT only for human
beings but also for all other species of living creatures.
(b) Similar natural processes would need to
also occur in a continuous manner at present - thus
scientists would be able to find many other examples
when in recent times such an evolution of one
species into another species actually takes place -
and they would be able to document these examples
in their complete cycles of transformations. But the
science is unable to indicate even a single example
of such a full cycle of transformations of one species
into another species. Furthermore (c) such a smooth
evolution would need to have some effective propelling
mechanisms. But apart from wild speculations which
are NOT supported by any evidence, human science
is unable to prove the existence of such an effective
mechanism that propels a random evolution, nor
indicate an example (and a proof) that this mechanism
in fact does work in nature.)
Proof:
(1) The first basis proposition is to be transformed
with the use of tautological form of the method known
under the name of "disjunctive syllogism". This
form can be written as [(p || q) && !p] => q,
in which the assertion "p" says "every new
species of living creatures, including humans,
are initiated by the appearance of just one
such a new creature", while the assertion "q"
says "every new species of living creatures,
including humans, are initiated by the
appearance of a couple of such new creatures",
in turn the assertion "!p" states "the fact that practically
all species of living creatures that populate the
Earth are able to multiply further by themselves
only when there exists simultaneously a couple
of them, means a male and a female, eliminates
completely the possibility that first could appear
just a single such new creature, instead of the
entire couple, e.g. just one person instead of a
couple of people that included a man and a woman -
capable of further multiplying just by themselves".
The transformation of these propositions leads to
the conclusion that "the humans were initiated by
the simultaneous appearance of a couple of people
that included a man and a woman - capable of further
multiplying just by themselves".
(2) Accepting this previous conclusion for an assertion
in the next phase of inference, and using the method
of "disjunctive syllogism", the tautological form of which
can be written as: [(p || q) && !p] => q, we obtain a
next conclusion which states that "the first couple of
people appeared on the Earth in a "rapid manner" -
i.e. rapidly and without any intermediate forms."
(3) The last couple of propositions allows us to derive
the final conclusion also with the method called the
"disjunctive syllogism", the tautological form of which
can be written as: [(p || q) && !p] => q. In this form the
assertion "p" says "the first couple of people, i.e. the
first woman and the first man, evolved randomly ("naturally")",
while assertion "q" states "the first couple of people
was created by God". Thus the final conclusion
states "the first couple of people, i.e. the
first woman and the first man, was created by God"!
Conclusion:
The above inference chain unambiguously and conclusively
proves the truth of the theorem that "the first couple of people,
i.e. the first woman and the first man, was created by God".
* * *
For the use of these readers who are NOT
familiar with the notation that is applied in the
above proof, I would like to explain that
symbols "p", "q", and "r" mark subsequent
"assertions" utilized in this proof as logical
variables. In turn symbols "&&", "||", and "=>"
mark logical operators "and", "inclusive or",
and "implies" (if ... => then ...").
It is also worth to mention about the validity of
the above proof. Because this proof utilizes
exclusively tautological forms of subsequent
methods, it remains valid for all values of
variables it uses. Thus practically it is error-proof.
If someone would like to undermine it, he or
she would need to undermine first the validity
of mathematical logic. In turn this logic is a
foundation for countless mathematical proofs
which with a large success were used by the
effective and precise discipline of mathematics.
Thus, since so strong proof for the creation
by God of the first couple of humans, means
the first woman and the first man (and also for the
creation by God first couples of all other living
creatures) we finally were able to develop,
it introduces for us huge implications. Because
of the existence of this proof, and also three
further proofs mentioned at the beginning of
this item, it becomes really important that
everyone of us verifies his or hers attitude
towards God, other world, moral life, etc., etc.
After all, without the verifying this attitude,
we may inflict ourselves the biggest harm that
one is able to inflict himself or herself.
Especially vital in the above proof is that it is a
component of four, similar by methods used, but
different by evidence that they utilize, formal proofs
that coexist in monograph
[1/5].
These four proofs include mentioned already earlier:
(1) the proof for the existence of the so-called
"counter-world" (i.e. the world that is inhabited
by God and by our souls) - which is presented
in subsection H1.1.4 from volume 4 of that
monograph [1/5], (2) the proof for the existence
of God - presented in subsection I3.3.4 from
volume 5 of that monograph [1/5], (3) this formal
proof for the creation of the first woman and the
first man by God - presented in subsection I1.4.2
from volume 5 of that monograph [1/5], and (4)
the formal proof that people have eternal souls -
presented in subsection I5.2.1 from volume 5 of
that monograph [1/5]. These four proofs in fact
formulate the foundation stones for the entirely
new scientific discipline about another world,
God, act of creation, soul, etc. In order to illustratively
realize here to the reader the weight of the appearance
of as many as four such proofs simultaneously,
it would be good to compare ourselves to old
time Maoris that inhabited New Zealand and that
had no idea of the existence of farm animals,
such as horses or cows. (Before first Europeans
arrived to New Zealand, these islands were inhabited
mainly by birds and by lizards.) So when these Maoris
saw the first horse, probably they suspected that
it is just a mirage or a freak of nature. When
they saw two horses, they started to be puzzled
and convinced that some new quality is just
entering their lives. When they saw three horses,
they could be absolutely sure that horses do
exist and that they need to take notice of them.
In turn when they saw four horses, they needed
to revise completely their view of the world that
surrounded them. (By the way, now Maoris are
biggest appreciators of horses and they cannot
live without these animals.)
A shocking results gives also the comparison
of arguments of so-called "evolutionists" with
so-called "creationists", in the light of the above
proof (and also in the light of other formal proofs
discussed here). The evolutionists generate
in science so loud noise, as if all evidence was
in their hands. In the result of this noise, and also
hysteria that these noise created in human science,
amongst present scientists almost no-one has the
courage to admit that he or she is a "creationist".
However, if one carefully examines the supposed
"evidence" which stands behind this noise, then
it turns out that it is just this proverbial noise of
"empty pots that make the most of noise". This
is because the evolutionists actually have no
even a single documented case of so-called
"missing link" - means the intermediate evolutionary
form of any amongst millions of species of
creatures that inhabit the Earth in the process
of changing into another species. And we are
talking here not only about the "missing link"
for human beings, but also the missing links
for horses, cows, dogs, etc. After all, amongst
these millions creatures which populate the Earth
the human science is unable to indicate the
"missing link" to any of them. This means that
the pool of evidence in disposal of evolutionists
is actually equal to zero. Evolutionists also do
not have documented even a single case of
seeing a full cycle of changes of one species
into another species on the Earth. Means that
also the principle of the development of new
species which is promoted by them is wrong,
as it has no precedence in a real life. Finally
evolutionists still are unable to indicate a
mechanism that would propel the random
evolution. They speculate that supposedly in
nature is working the principle of the "survival
of fittest", but still again the empirical evidence
eliminates this survival as a mechanism that
propels the evolution. After all, there are known
cases when the oldest animals survived in the
unchanged form until today. A well-known example
of just such oldest animal that exists on the Earth
until today are trilobites which I saw myself
(with my own eyes) as they are sold today on fish
markets of Malaysia as so-called "king's crabs".
So how the "survival of the fittest" could be a propelling
mechanism of the evolution, when it allows to survive
until today even these oldest animals in spite of
"most modern co
